Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Wireless temperature monitoring and logging

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Svend

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Denmark
    Denmark

Posted 08 March 2010 - 01:45 PM

Dear all,

:helpplease: I'm new to this forum and the HACCP principles so I really hope you can provide some input to my open issue:

I work within the electronic refrigeration controller industry and am currently looking into the market of wireless temperature monitoring and logging equipment. So far I found a dozen suppliers offering such systems but I wonder how users actually perceive the systems:

- What benefits did you obtain from the system?
- What problems did you encounter?
- Why was a wireless system chosen over a wired system?
- Where in the food lifecycle does it offer special advantages for you - preparation, cold storage of unprepared food, hot storage of finished food, other?

Please don't state manufacturer brands unless you specifically want to.

Thanks in advance for your kind help
Svend



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,836 posts
  • 1363 thanks
884
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 11 March 2010 - 11:29 AM

Dear all,

:helpplease: I'm new to this forum and the HACCP principles so I really hope you can provide some input to my open issue:

I work within the electronic refrigeration controller industry and am currently looking into the market of wireless temperature monitoring and logging equipment. So far I found a dozen suppliers offering such systems but I wonder how users actually perceive the systems:

- What benefits did you obtain from the system?
- What problems did you encounter?
- Why was a wireless system chosen over a wired system?
- Where in the food lifecycle does it offer special advantages for you - preparation, cold storage of unprepared food, hot storage of finished food, other?

Please don't state manufacturer brands unless you specifically want to.

Thanks in advance for your kind help
Svend

Does anyone have experience of wireless temperature monitoring and logging to share with Svend?

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Svend

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Denmark
    Denmark

Posted 12 March 2010 - 07:50 AM

Hi,

Part of the problem could potentially be that it is "technology in search of a problem" - the technology for wireless temperature measurement and logging is available but there may not be a market need for it.

So please feel free to reply with whatever crosses your mind on my questions:
- Perhaps did not use wireless because you didn't know it exists?
- Or you didn't use it because it didn't fit your CCP needs?
- Or any other reason?

Sounds like I'm desperate but I'm not (yet) :rolleyes:

BR Svend



bibi

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 119 posts
  • 4 thanks
0
Neutral

Posted 13 March 2010 - 01:45 PM

hi

we use comark for 10 years now, no problem.
we use data loggers in the cold,freezer rooms as well in the vans. a calibrator to move around.
you can control from a display(through transmitters) your readings depend on your settings
every minute if you want. and download your results, it is called evolution system.
calibrations: for the probes weekly(ice& boiling water)
send the calibrators, thermometers, data loggers, calibrator for the probes....yearly

I hope this will help.
bibi



Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,233 posts
  • 1293 thanks
611
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 18 March 2010 - 02:00 AM

hi

we use comark for 10 years now, no problem.
we use data loggers in the cold,freezer rooms as well in the vans. a calibrator to move around.
you can control from a display(through transmitters) your readings depend on your settings
every minute if you want. and download your results, it is called evolution system.
calibrations: for the probes weekly(ice& boiling water)
send the calibrators, thermometers, data loggers, calibrator for the probes....yearly

I hope this will help.
bibi


I have used a Comark system and would say it is pretty good.

Yes there is lots of retrospective information available from the system but more importantly it can be set to alarm and contact someone should the temperature rise above your preset limit.

Regards,

Tony


bibi

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 119 posts
  • 4 thanks
0
Neutral

Posted 18 March 2010 - 03:00 PM

hi tony
i know its pretty good, :biggrin: but not when the alarm sound on your mobile on the middle of your sleep :angry: and you are the keyholder.
bibi



pablo coronel

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 32 posts
  • 4 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Ecuador
    Ecuador
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Raleigh, NC, USA

Posted 19 March 2010 - 11:54 AM

Wireless transmitter are wonderful IMHO.
They allow you to monitor many locations without having to wire the whole plant.

One of the drawbacks we have found is that sometimes interference can occur.



Svend

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Denmark
    Denmark

Posted 22 March 2010 - 10:13 AM

Hi,

Thanks for your replies.

Seems that wireless temperature monitoring makes sense if wired sensors are not an option due to 2 primary reasons:
- Sensor wiring has unacceptably high cost or is impossible for technical reasons.
- Sensors must be mobile and easily movable in the plant.

BR Svend



Jennyb723

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 26 posts
  • 5 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:21 PM

We are using a wireless temperature monitoring system and is also sends a lovely alarm to our phones/email if temperatures are off. It's been a great program except for the occasional night alarms. We are currently trying to figure out monitoring requirements per USDA FSIS of our temperatures which are stored electronically. Usually, we would check our refrigerators and freezer temps daily. Since we have a system that alarms us when it is out of range, is it still necessary to visually inspect the temps daily? And do we need to document the fact that we checked the temps? If so can we print out the temps from the program and sign and date the sheet or do we need yet another form?

These are not CCPs but we want to ensure we are monitoring our PRPs correctly.

Warm regards,
Jennifer



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:41 PM

Dear jenny / All,

I appreciate the logic of yr question in comparison to related post -

http://www.ifsqn.com...dpost__p__57545

Out of curiosity, do FSIS not publish their detailed requirements anywhere ? I sort of got the impression that FDA/USDA issue minor encyclopedias of such stuff. Maybe that is the problem of course. :smile:

Rgds Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Svend

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Denmark
    Denmark

Posted 20 December 2012 - 09:20 AM

Hi,

An electronic monitoring system should be able to detect if it gets our of order e.g. due to sensor defects or low batteries, and it should be able to alarm you of such failures. If your wireless sensor system can do this then you don't need to monitor temperatures by direct observation too.

At least that is how I understand this Q & A: http://askfsis.custh.../1055/related/1


Please correct me if I'm wrong :whistle:


BR Svend



Thanked by 1 Member:

pranav

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • Newbie
  • 30 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 December 2012 - 01:35 PM

Please let us know the market price.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 20 December 2012 - 01:56 PM

Dear jenny,

Assuming you are a small meat/poultry plant, the attachment below appears to be a relevant primary FSIS document regarding Va/Ve compliance requirements for CCPs and Prerequisites. Further reinforced by supplemental Q/A documents like that linked in Svend's post.

Attached File  FSIS 2012, HACCP_Systems_Validation_Draft_Guidance_0412.pdf   600.22KB   46 downloads

Some of the guidance document reads like a foreign language IMO but I eventually deduced that -
(a) routine recording of duplicate data measurements is unrequired in both cases.
(b) an ongoing / annual review of generated records (eg data logging) is necessary for Ve activities in both cases.
Hopefully this answers part of yr OP.

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

Jennyb723

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 26 posts
  • 5 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 20 December 2012 - 08:59 PM

Dear jenny,

Assuming you are a small meat/poultry plant, the attachment below appears to be a relevant primary FSIS document regarding Va/Ve compliance requirements for CCPs and Prerequisites. Further reinforced by supplemental Q/A documents like that linked in Svend's post.

Attached File  FSIS 2012, HACCP_Systems_Validation_Draft_Guidance_0412.pdf   600.22KB   46 downloads

Some of the guidance document reads like a foreign language IMO but I eventually deduced that -
(a) routine recording of duplicate data measurements is unrequired in both cases.
(b) an ongoing / annual review of generated records (eg data logging) is necessary for Ve activities in both cases.
Hopefully this answers part of yr OP.

Rgds / Charles.C


You are a walking, talking encyclopedia! Thank you!!


ajrfrank

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 23 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • El Salvador
    El Salvador

Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:52 PM

Does anyone know about this wireless temperature monitoring system for a steam cooker? to monitor either steams temperature or product temperature?





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users