Dear Tony,
It is based on an International Standard so not particularly UK specific.
As a side-comment, IMO, the ISO micro.standards often significantly over-simplify micro.procedures (for brevity perhaps). Their salmonella / vibrio methodologies (unless they have been updated) are classic examples compared to the US-FDA / BAM for example. Never used their "APC" procedure so cannot comment.
Unfortunately, "plate count" methodologies are famous for their variable results under typical lab. conditions even where standard procedures are supposedly observed. I have had material rejected due simple differences of incubation temperature for a "aerobic plate count". At one time (now?), methods for APC even specified the brand name of media allowed to be used. Variability still occurs in (cheaper?) products although labs are supposed to productively validate their media (??)
My point was primarily to be very "caveat emptor" where micro. data comparisons are to be made. Many labs are prone to using methods "based" on XXX International Standard. The "based" is very user-friendly.
Rgds / Charles.C