- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Essentials
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More
Raw Material Decision Tree for Ingredients
Started by ILANA, Oct 03 2010 01:02 PM
11 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 03 October 2010 - 01:02 PM
#2
Posted 03 October 2010 - 07:39 PM
BUMP for Ilana.
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
|
Thanked by 2 Members:
|
,
|
#3
Posted 05 October 2010 - 03:48 PM
Dear Ilana,
Here are 2 similar but slightly different approaches -
Haccp tree for raw material (1).doc 130KB
1508 downloads
haccp tree for raw material (2).xls 16.5KB
1710 downloads
Rgds / Charles.C
Here are 2 similar but slightly different approaches -
Haccp tree for raw material (1).doc 130KB
1508 downloadsRgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
|
Thanked by 4 Members:
|
, , ,
|
#4
Posted 07 October 2010 - 12:18 AM
Here is one I developed with some example comments filled into the form. I find it more important to approach where the hazard is addressed than to say an ingredient itself is a critical item. Hope it is helpful.
Cathy
Cathy
Attached Files
Cathy Crawford, HACCP Consulting Group
http://haccpcg.com/
http://haccpcg.com/
|
Thanked by 2 Members:
|
,
|
#5
Posted 07 October 2010 - 06:31 AM
Dear Cathy,
As you imply, I think the use of a separate ingredient risk assessment is rather rare these days.
I guess the use of a prerequisite format is the most common choice, particularly in view of the ever-expanding lists from GFSI.
For traditional haccp, I normally give a preliminary overview list of inputs with their characteristic hazards (if any) but without any assessment of their risk aspects. The latter are then evaluated at individual steps similar to yourself but with added risk columns which will probably be mandatory if considering ISO 22000 (but not for GFSI I guess). I hv noticed that US layouts often avoid such explicit quantitative details and seem to prefer intuitively judged results. (Maybe Americans prefer mental arithmetic, both methods are equally subjective of course).
Interested to know how a supplier guarantees freedom from buckshot (nice touch
).
Rgds / Charles.C
As you imply, I think the use of a separate ingredient risk assessment is rather rare these days.
I guess the use of a prerequisite format is the most common choice, particularly in view of the ever-expanding lists from GFSI.
For traditional haccp, I normally give a preliminary overview list of inputs with their characteristic hazards (if any) but without any assessment of their risk aspects. The latter are then evaluated at individual steps similar to yourself but with added risk columns which will probably be mandatory if considering ISO 22000 (but not for GFSI I guess). I hv noticed that US layouts often avoid such explicit quantitative details and seem to prefer intuitively judged results. (Maybe Americans prefer mental arithmetic, both methods are equally subjective of course).
Interested to know how a supplier guarantees freedom from buckshot (nice touch
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
#6
Posted 07 October 2010 - 12:18 PM
I think the use of a separate ingredient risk assessment is rather rare these days.
For traditional haccp, I normally give a preliminary overview list of inputs with their characteristic hazards (if any) but without any assessment of their risk aspects. The latter are then evaluated at individual steps
Rgds / Charles.C
Agreed Charles
Although it may be useful to identify risks, I don't see the whole process and individual process steps being considered.
So taking say storage of raw materials as an example this can provide opportunity for cross-contamination or microbial growth to unacceptable levels.
CODEX:
List all potential hazards associated with each step, conduct a hazard analysis, and consider any measures to control identified hazards
Regards,
Tony
Live Webinar Friday 5th December: Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Also available via the previous webinar recording. Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.
IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009:
Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.
Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.
#7
Posted 07 October 2010 - 01:39 PM
The risk columns that address severity etc are not always used. It is often assumed when determining if a hazard is likely, one has considered risk and severity. In many regulatory situations, severity does not apply - if there is a likely risk you must control it.
The ingredient hazard analysis is not intended to stand alone. It is to supplement the actual step by step analysis including all steps. Where an ingredient is identified as a concern, it is then deemed significant to include on the flow chart and hazard analysis when it enters the process and where it is used or may contribute to risk.
The ingredient hazard analysis is not intended to stand alone. It is to supplement the actual step by step analysis including all steps. Where an ingredient is identified as a concern, it is then deemed significant to include on the flow chart and hazard analysis when it enters the process and where it is used or may contribute to risk.
Cathy Crawford, HACCP Consulting Group
http://haccpcg.com/
http://haccpcg.com/
#8
Posted 08 October 2010 - 04:24 AM
In many regulatory situations, severity does not apply - if there is a likely risk you must control it.
This may be a function of different terminology, IMO the word "Risk" implies that severity does apply:
Risk - A function of the probability of an adverse health effect and the severity of that effect, consequent to a hazard or hazards in food.
Regards,
Tony
Live Webinar Friday 5th December: Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Also available via the previous webinar recording. Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.
IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009:
Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.
Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.
#9
Posted 06 December 2018 - 07:21 AM
Hi Charles,
What is your reference for the raw materials decision tree? Why do we need to assess the raw material is it is significant or insignificant, then re-assess (using the decision tree) if sensitive or not sensitive? Are there cases were the raw material is significant but not sensitive?
This is in reply to your answer: my question is for the 2nd attachment.
Dear Ilana,
Here are 2 similar but slightly different approaches -
Haccp tree for raw material (1).doc 130KB 846 downloads
haccp tree for raw material (2).xls 16.5KB 919 downloads
Rgds / Charles.C
Edited by Charles.C, 06 December 2018 - 08:56 AM.
#10
Posted 06 December 2018 - 09:39 AM
Hi Charles,
What is your reference for the raw materials decision tree? Why do we need to assess the raw material is it is significant or insignificant, then re-assess (using the decision tree) if sensitive or not sensitive? Are there cases were the raw material is significant but not sensitive?
This is in reply to your answer: my question is for the 2nd attachment.
Hi Angie,
You can find trees like the one shown in various texts, eg Practical HACCP by Mortimore et al.
The tree is an (optional) tool to aid evaluation of hazards deriving from the raw materials. "Significant" refers to the hazard, "Sensitive" refers to the RM.
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
#11
Posted 06 December 2018 - 10:51 AM
Hi Angie,
You can find trees like the one shown in various texts, eg Practical HACCP by Mortimore et al.
The tree is an (optional) tool to aid evaluation of hazards deriving from the raw materials. "Significant" refers to the hazard, "Sensitive" refers to the RM.
Hi Charles,
Thank you very much for replying to my inquiry. Are there cases where the raw material is significant but not sensitive?
#12
Posted 06 December 2018 - 12:19 PM
Hi Charles,
Thank you very much for replying to my inquiry. Are there cases where the raw material is significant but not sensitive?
Hi Angie,
Yes, many.
For example, think "cooking".
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










