Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Micro. Guidelines for Food Contact Surfaces


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

#51 LachelleOMP

LachelleOMP

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 28 posts
  • 0 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 19 November 2018 - 02:28 AM

Does anyone have an update to this



#52 Cobus

Cobus

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 14 posts
  • 7 thanks
1
Neutral

  • South Africa
    South Africa
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA

Posted 27 November 2018 - 06:14 AM

Hi

Thanks for the info. Good to see our country features on the list. The problem that I have with our legislation is that it does not specify pathogens. So what happens is the allowed 100 CFU happens to be Listeria?



#53 MsMars

MsMars

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 601 posts
  • 193 thanks
146
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 November 2018 - 08:39 PM

Hi

Thanks for the info. Good to see our country features on the list. The problem that I have with our legislation is that it does not specify pathogens. So what happens is the allowed 100 CFU happens to be Listeria?

 

It's a good consideration.  However, I think these guidelines are generally for validation of cleaning. If you are RTE and have a Listeria concern, you should also be doing in-process testing and/or finished product testing, which would tell you whether or not you actually have a Listeria problem. 

 

Edit: I should add that if you are RTE or similar, you should also be doing environmental monitoring for pathogens such as Listeria.


Edited by MsMars, 27 November 2018 - 08:47 PM.


Thanked by 1 Member:

#54 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,842 posts
  • 4983 thanks
1,021
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 28 November 2018 - 01:35 PM

Hi

Thanks for the info. Good to see our country features on the list. The problem that I have with our legislation is that it does not specify pathogens. So what happens is the allowed 100 CFU happens to be Listeria?

 

Hi Cobus,

 

Just for accuracy, I suspect 100cfu(/gm?) is unlikely to refer to Listeria. Possibly L.monocytogenes.

 

And, similar to MsMars comments, the "100cfu" probably refers to a product, not a surface ??


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#55 Mattej

Mattej

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 16 April 2019 - 03:31 PM

Thanks for this great reference Charles!



#56 rubert

rubert

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 23 April 2019 - 10:20 AM

Dear All,

I previously posted a table of various micro. guidelines for food contact surfaces which were mostly issued pre-2000 at this link –

http://www.ifsqn.com...dpost__p__22352

To update the earlier info., the attached excel file presents guideline data I have accumulated for 12 countries issued in the period 2000 – 2012. The compilation demonstrates that for a range of food-related scenarios, some “average” opinions for various (just) cleaned surfaces are –

(a) For Aerobic Plate Count (APC) - the majority of data suggests that, for routine cleaning/sanitising, surfaces typically have maximum APC counts in the range 10-100cfu/cm2 .
(b) For factors like Coliform, (generic) E.coli, Enterobacteriaceae, S.aureus, the expected maxima are, predictably, low, eg 1-10 cfu/cm2, or undetected. The latter requirement also invariably applies for “zero-tolerance” pathogenic microbial species.

Hopefully of some interest. Further input / comments welcome as usual.

attachicon.gif Compilation of International Micro. Guidelines for food contact surfaces, 2000 onwards.xls

Rgds / Charles.C

Thanks 



#57 JOSEPH ADEWUYI

JOSEPH ADEWUYI

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Nigeria
    Nigeria

Posted 29 September 2019 - 11:56 AM

Thanks Charles for this information
Very relevant and useful



#58 Niranjan

Niranjan

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 01 October 2019 - 06:19 AM

Great job 



#59 jameshartley

jameshartley

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 28 January 2020 - 11:57 AM

Very helpful Charles, thank you!



#60 Cheza0021

Cheza0021

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 27 posts
  • 20 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 May 2020 - 03:49 PM

Thanks Charles.C

#61 Naamfon

Naamfon

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 82 posts
  • 47 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Thailand
    Thailand
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Searching , Finding & learning new knowledge, create good friends, Travel , share good thing , eat and eating.

Posted 13 January 2021 - 06:27 AM

Dear Charles ,

 

Do you have an update this file ? 

 

Dear All,

I previously posted a table of various micro. guidelines for food contact surfaces which were mostly issued pre-2000 at this link –

http://www.ifsqn.com...dpost__p__22352

To update the earlier info., the attached excel file presents guideline data I have accumulated for 12 countries issued in the period 2000 – 2012. The compilation demonstrates that for a range of food-related scenarios, some “average” opinions for various (just) cleaned surfaces are –

(a) For Aerobic Plate Count (APC) - the majority of data suggests that, for routine cleaning/sanitising, surfaces typically have maximum APC counts in the range 10-100cfu/cm2 .
(b) For factors like Coliform, (generic) E.coli, Enterobacteriaceae, S.aureus, the expected maxima are, predictably, low, eg 1-10 cfu/cm2, or undetected. The latter requirement also invariably applies for “zero-tolerance” pathogenic microbial species.

Hopefully of some interest. Further input / comments welcome as usual.

attachicon.gif Compilation of International Micro. Guidelines for food contact surfaces, 2000 onwards.xls

Rgds / Charles.C


Thousands of candles can be lit from a single candle, and the life of the candle will not be shortened. Happiness never decreases by being shared.

#62 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,842 posts
  • 4983 thanks
1,021
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 13 January 2021 - 07:51 AM

Dear Charles ,

 

Do you have an update this file ? 

 

Hi Naamfon,

 

Not a global one although I and other people have added a few more recent documents here and there. For example there are some "relatively"  recent and quite interesting documents (eg Posts 6, 8, 9) in thread linked below.

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...es/#entry168373

 

I suspect there have been few major changes/unifications since my 2012 survey, eg one can still find recommendations for APC counts to be less than 2.5 and 100 cfu/cm2 respectively :smile:


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

#63 Naamfon

Naamfon

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 82 posts
  • 47 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Thailand
    Thailand
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Searching , Finding & learning new knowledge, create good friends, Travel , share good thing , eat and eating.

Posted 13 January 2021 - 03:34 PM

Thank you ^^

Hi Naamfon,

 

Not a global one although I and other people have added a few more recent documents here and there. For example there are some "relatively"  recent and quite interesting documents (eg Posts 6, 8, 9) in thread linked below.

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...es/#entry168373

 

I suspect there have been few major changes/unifications since my 2012 survey, eg one can still find recommendations for APC counts to be less than 2.5 and 100 cfu/cm2 respectively :smile:


Thousands of candles can be lit from a single candle, and the life of the candle will not be shortened. Happiness never decreases by being shared.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users