Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

How often to check historical evidence of substitution or adulteration


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#26 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,858 posts
  • 4987 thanks
1,023
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 27 November 2015 - 04:15 PM

I've no idea Charles, I'm not the BRC auditor. I just presented to him what I had. He might have been satisfied with packaging not on there. I'm not the expert on BRC V7, I just do what I can to protect my products.

 

As for a database, again I have no idea, I did my research and looked at areas of vulnerability (or what I thought were areas of vulnerability). There may be something out there (or an opportunity for someone)

 

Hi izzy,

 

Appreciate the feedback. I daresay the folks reading the parallel Packaging thread may also be interested,


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#27 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,858 posts
  • 4987 thanks
1,023
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 28 November 2015 - 05:39 AM

addendum to previous post -

 

FWIW here is one (food) post where the auditor did complain regarding no VA for packaging -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...use/#entry92269

 

cf. the (latter-half) comment in this post -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...res/#entry95625

 

I guess only time will tell. And hopefully the BRC Guidance.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users