Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Drain Testing SOP

drain cleaning drain testing listeria

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 hgardner22

hgardner22

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 February 2019 - 03:57 PM

Hello,

 

I have been tasked with creating a Drain Testing SOP for my site. Background: we are a dietary supplement distributor (do finished product packing), there are two drains that are not critical (one in a supply closet the other outside an office door that leads to the warehouse). I have the cleaning procedure semi-completed (add 1/4 c of bleach + 12 1/4 c of water to pout down each drain). What I need help with is testing parameters that should be met is I focus on listeria, e.coli and salmonella. Frequency of testing I'm pushing for is 2x year.  

 

Any help would be most appreciated!



#2 hgardner22

hgardner22

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 February 2019 - 04:00 PM

Also we do not have a micro lab onsite, so any testing would have to go to a 3rd party.



#3 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4864 thanks
949
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 14 February 2019 - 05:24 PM

Hello,

 

I have been tasked with creating a Drain Testing SOP for my site. Background: we are a dietary supplement distributor (do finished product packing), there are two drains that are not critical (one in a supply closet the other outside an office door that leads to the warehouse). I have the cleaning procedure semi-completed (add 1/4 c of bleach + 12 1/4 c of water to pout down each drain). What I need help with is testing parameters that should be met is I focus on listeria, e.coli and salmonella. Frequency of testing I'm pushing for is 2x year.  

 

Any help would be most appreciated!

 

The logical target for all 3 would be undetectable.

The frequency should initially be elevated.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

#4 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,154 posts
  • 812 thanks
668
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 14 February 2019 - 06:07 PM

The parameter would be zero.

I would suggest going with a monthly or every other month plan of testing on thr front end and then as you do not have hits cutting back. Your proposed lag time between testing is excessive.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC Group | +1.800.793.7042 | Serving the Food, Food Packaging, DC, Restaurant & Hotel Industry 
SQF On-Site & Remote System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
GFSI (Broadscope) Certification Continuity eConsultants | EMF Consulting | Approved Supplier
Business Operational Consultants | Blockchain & Crypto-Currency Developer Consultants
Trouble-Shooting & Turn-Around Consulting for food manufactuers on-site & remote
Internal Auditor, PCQI & Consultant Start-Up Training | eConsultant | SQF-GAP | EMF Consulting
Serving Small Family Owned Operations to Large Businesses - USA, Panama, Costa Rica & Caribbean

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  

 

 

What's it worth to you?

https://bit.ly/3dXaqfs

 

 


Thanked by 1 Member:

#5 hgardner22

hgardner22

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 February 2019 - 06:26 PM

Do you have any recommendations for testing applications. I understand that there are test kits you can purchase, use (swab) and send out for testing.



#6 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,154 posts
  • 812 thanks
668
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 14 February 2019 - 06:29 PM

Contact a lab that you would like to use. They will provide you with the test kits and then you submit the testers back to them for,analysis.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC Group | +1.800.793.7042 | Serving the Food, Food Packaging, DC, Restaurant & Hotel Industry 
SQF On-Site & Remote System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
GFSI (Broadscope) Certification Continuity eConsultants | EMF Consulting | Approved Supplier
Business Operational Consultants | Blockchain & Crypto-Currency Developer Consultants
Trouble-Shooting & Turn-Around Consulting for food manufactuers on-site & remote
Internal Auditor, PCQI & Consultant Start-Up Training | eConsultant | SQF-GAP | EMF Consulting
Serving Small Family Owned Operations to Large Businesses - USA, Panama, Costa Rica & Caribbean

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  

 

 

What's it worth to you?

https://bit.ly/3dXaqfs

 

 


Thanked by 1 Member:

#7 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4864 thanks
949
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 14 February 2019 - 08:43 PM

The parameter would be zero.

I would suggest going with a monthly or every other month plan of testing on thr front end and then as you do not have hits cutting back. Your proposed lag time between testing is excessive.

 

Microbiological Criteria abhor "zero".

 

@ hgardner - Depending on the specific Procedure, the project (assuming null results) may ultimately prove nothing due sampling/analytical limitations.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#8 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,154 posts
  • 812 thanks
668
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 14 February 2019 - 09:13 PM

Excuse me Charles - undetectable might be a better term.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC Group | +1.800.793.7042 | Serving the Food, Food Packaging, DC, Restaurant & Hotel Industry 
SQF On-Site & Remote System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
GFSI (Broadscope) Certification Continuity eConsultants | EMF Consulting | Approved Supplier
Business Operational Consultants | Blockchain & Crypto-Currency Developer Consultants
Trouble-Shooting & Turn-Around Consulting for food manufactuers on-site & remote
Internal Auditor, PCQI & Consultant Start-Up Training | eConsultant | SQF-GAP | EMF Consulting
Serving Small Family Owned Operations to Large Businesses - USA, Panama, Costa Rica & Caribbean

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  

 

 

What's it worth to you?

https://bit.ly/3dXaqfs

 

 


#9 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4864 thanks
949
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 14 February 2019 - 10:05 PM

Excuse me Charles - undetectable might be a better term.

 

In practice, the usual is "not detected" in XYZ. (strictly the methodology, hopefully "Standard",  should be included).

 

Sampling/Analytical always rules.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#10 Hank Major

Hank Major

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 317 posts
  • 98 thanks
32
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 15 February 2019 - 08:49 PM

I would ask the laboratory you are using to send you their directions for sampling drain water, and then use them to create your SOP.



#11 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4864 thanks
949
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 15 February 2019 - 11:16 PM

I would ask the laboratory you are using to send you their directions for sampling drain water, and then use them to create your SOP.

 

Good idea.

 

One should also ask to include an estimation of the detection sensitivity of the recommended method.

 

The perpetual problem with swabbing/analysing  plant objects for pathogens is that they are likely to be "missed". This is the reason for using "indicators" but unfortunately the latter cannot be used as confirmation.

 

It's a dilemma.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users