Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Are there any good vulnerability assessments templates to use?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 larissaj

larissaj

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 116 posts
  • 17 thanks
10
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 28 August 2020 - 03:48 PM

Is there any good vulnerability templates to use? Especially if they mention the following : potential for food fraud for each ingredient, including any mitigation strategies in the event a significant food fraud potential exists.



#2 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4866 thanks
952
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 28 August 2020 - 04:10 PM

Is there any good vulnerability templates to use? Especially if they mention the following : potential for food fraud for each ingredient, including any mitigation strategies in the event a significant food fraud potential exists.

 

As per usual - Standard = ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#3 larissaj

larissaj

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 116 posts
  • 17 thanks
10
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 28 August 2020 - 04:11 PM

For our suppliers



#4 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4866 thanks
952
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 28 August 2020 - 04:34 PM

For our suppliers

 

I hope yr suppliers are technically up to it.

 

See the BRC link in Post6 in adjacent thread to this one ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#5 larissaj

larissaj

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 116 posts
  • 17 thanks
10
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 28 August 2020 - 04:41 PM

Im referring to the food fraud vulnerability tools, I used one and I didnt like it and neither did the auditor so I was hoping someone had used others before. 



#6 Simon

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,343 posts
  • 1298 thanks
607
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 28 August 2020 - 04:43 PM

I hope yr suppliers are technically up to it.

 

See the BRC link in Post6 in adjacent thread to this one ?

 

Adjacent thread?


hand-pointing-down.gif
 
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 140 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html

 

recommend-us-on-facebook.png


#7 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4866 thanks
952
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 28 August 2020 - 11:41 PM

Adjacent thread?

 

Hi Simon,

 

Sorry, I posted the (1st) link repeated below but it somehow got "lost" in the transfer -

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...ce/#entry164747

 

PS - also see the excel here -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...542/#entry95690

 

Another frequently referenced VA tool is linked below which suppliers might like for its (relatively) simple scoring approach (criticisms noted in thread were apparently  ignored by BRC).

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...ed/#entry121799

 

Whatever method is used inevitably demands access to a food fraud database for which afaik USP have somewhat cornered the market  with their non-free product (alternatives do exist but afaik are less comprehensive).

 

Suggested mitigation strategies are offered in various other threads in the Forum, notably for BRC and SQF.

 

 

@Larissa - which method was not  liked ? (the one most frequently disparaged IMEX is the pwc tool despite SQF's implicit approval)

 

PPS - the various GFSI-recognized Standards all seem to have some differences in their preferred approaches to VA. However, audit-wise, maybe not so much.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users