Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Corporate SQF Practitioner

sqf corporate lead QA

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

MBrown042

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 77 posts
  • 13 thanks
7
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 25 February 2014 - 04:00 PM

Hello All,

 

Can a corporate QA director act as a backup to a SQF practitioner to multiple sites?

 

Please let me know your thoughts.

 

Thank you,

 

MBrown



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,607 posts
  • 1329 thanks
761
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 25 February 2014 - 04:51 PM

Please don't post multiple topics with the same question...it's not necessary.


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Thanked by 1 Member:

Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,318 posts
  • 322 thanks
275
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted 25 February 2014 - 05:01 PM

I would say no, in my opinion, the back up should have the specific working knowledge of that facility and with more than a handful of locations, that would be very hard to manage. I suppsoe you COULD document where each emergency shower is located and maybe if all your facilities are laid out the same, you could manage that.  If not, it could become tricky. I feel that back position would be best someone in that facility.

 

Also, since the back up needs to be available in case the Practitioner was out, what happens if multiple Practitioners are out when an audit occurs?  The corporate person cannot be in two places at once.

 

Setanta


-Setanta         

 

 

 


Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,625 posts
  • 267 thanks
172
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 25 February 2014 - 05:34 PM

I would agree with Setanta.  We have always had a backup on site. 


Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

Marshenko

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 267 posts
  • 105 thanks
40
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 February 2014 - 07:53 PM

Can?  Yes.

Should?  No.  See previous responses.



Slab

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 427 posts
  • 201 thanks
99
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Heel of the Boot
  • Interests:Reading (history, science fiction), Photography, drawing,food safety, metrology, TQM, hoplology, etc.

Posted 25 February 2014 - 08:48 PM

Define backup.  Permanent absence, one day, one week?

 

Corporate as in multi-state, multi-national?  Absolutely not.  Very bad idea.

Same municipality?  Doable but a very risky practice.

 

Bottom line is any multi-site facility should invest in training for a leveled practitioner, for both "absence" fill in and internal audit practices.


Food Safety News  Marine Stewardship Council

 

"Some people freak out when they see small vertebra in their pasta" ~ Chef John


genebartholomew

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:00 PM

Nothing in the code that says you can't. So absolutely yes. Remember this is as a backup to the main practitioner. In fact, I think it is a good idea, not a bad one, as it forces a corporate person to get more involved at the local level. The concerns expressed are not warranted based on this being a back up. In many cases, the SQF practitioner has little to do on a day to day basis if programs are set up properly. To see it otherwise misses the whole point of SQF.



damiandoerfer

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 11 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 27 February 2014 - 12:42 AM

Hello All,

 

Can a corporate QA director act as a backup to a SQF practitioner to multiple sites?

 

Please let me know your thoughts.

 

Thank you,

 

MBrown

During our gap analysis for SQF, we asked the same question of two different auditors from two different auditing firms and they both gave the same answer : "Backup should be at the same plant."



Thanked by 2 Members:

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,921 posts
  • 980 thanks
878
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA
    Never give up, never give in - always win!
    Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachusetts

Posted 01 March 2014 - 02:05 AM

There is no difference between first and second - both are required to meet the guidelines, full time employee, 1 location, etc.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
Glenn Oster Consulting | SQF System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
eConsultant, Internal Auditor Training, Compliance Consulting for SQF to determine capital improvements
 
For about the cost of half-a-cup of coffee eveyday you can have an SQF Consultant at your fingertips -
 
 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users