Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Corporate SQF Practitioner

sqf corporate lead QA

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 MBrown042

MBrown042

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 77 posts
  • 13 thanks
5
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 25 February 2014 - 04:00 PM

Hello All,

 

Can a corporate QA director act as a backup to a SQF practitioner to multiple sites?

 

Please let me know your thoughts.

 

Thank you,

 

MBrown



#2 Simon

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,285 posts
  • 1290 thanks
588
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 25 February 2014 - 04:51 PM

Please don't post multiple topics with the same question...it's not necessary.


hand-pointing-down.gif
 
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 140 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html

 

recommend-us-on-facebook.png


Thanked by 1 Member:

#3 Setanta

Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,134 posts
  • 288 thanks
180
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted 25 February 2014 - 05:01 PM

I would say no, in my opinion, the back up should have the specific working knowledge of that facility and with more than a handful of locations, that would be very hard to manage. I suppsoe you COULD document where each emergency shower is located and maybe if all your facilities are laid out the same, you could manage that.  If not, it could become tricky. I feel that back position would be best someone in that facility.

 

Also, since the back up needs to be available in case the Practitioner was out, what happens if multiple Practitioners are out when an audit occurs?  The corporate person cannot be in two places at once.

 

Setanta


-Setanta         

 

 

 


#4 Snookie

Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,625 posts
  • 267 thanks
171
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 25 February 2014 - 05:34 PM

I would agree with Setanta.  We have always had a backup on site. 


Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

#5 Marshenko

Marshenko

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 265 posts
  • 102 thanks
40
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 February 2014 - 07:53 PM

Can?  Yes.

Should?  No.  See previous responses.



#6 Slab

Slab

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 344 posts
  • 167 thanks
65
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Heel of the Boot
  • Interests:Reading (history, science fiction), Photography, drawing,food safety, metrology, TQM, hoplology, etc.

Posted 25 February 2014 - 08:48 PM

Define backup.  Permanent absence, one day, one week?

 

Corporate as in multi-state, multi-national?  Absolutely not.  Very bad idea.

Same municipality?  Doable but a very risky practice.

 

Bottom line is any multi-site facility should invest in training for a leveled practitioner, for both "absence" fill in and internal audit practices.


Food Safety News  Marine Stewardship Council  Blue Ocean Institute  

 

"Some people freak out when they see small vertebra in their pasta" ~ Chef John


#7 genebartholomew

genebartholomew

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:00 PM

Nothing in the code that says you can't. So absolutely yes. Remember this is as a backup to the main practitioner. In fact, I think it is a good idea, not a bad one, as it forces a corporate person to get more involved at the local level. The concerns expressed are not warranted based on this being a back up. In many cases, the SQF practitioner has little to do on a day to day basis if programs are set up properly. To see it otherwise misses the whole point of SQF.



#8 damiandoerfer

damiandoerfer

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 11 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 27 February 2014 - 12:42 AM

Hello All,

 

Can a corporate QA director act as a backup to a SQF practitioner to multiple sites?

 

Please let me know your thoughts.

 

Thank you,

 

MBrown

During our gap analysis for SQF, we asked the same question of two different auditors from two different auditing firms and they both gave the same answer : "Backup should be at the same plant."



Thanked by 2 Members:

#9 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,076 posts
  • 782 thanks
648
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 01 March 2014 - 02:05 AM

There is no difference between first and second - both are required to meet the guidelines, full time employee, 1 location, etc.


Kind regards,

 

Glenn Oster
 
 
GOC GROUP / +1.800.793.7042 / Food - Food Packaging - Food Storage/DC

SQF, BRC & IFS System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants

Serving Small-to-Mid-Size Businesses | International Cross-Border C-CUR Acceptance

Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant | SQF, BRC & IFS Pre-Development or Pre-Audit GAP

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  -- 

 

 

URGENT - No more Jonah in the whale...

https://bit.ly/3kBj997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

EV SSL Certificate