2 replies to this topic

[redfox]

Hello All,

 

It may help on Food Fraud topics.

 

regards,

redfox

 

 MSU-FFIR-GFSI-Food-Fraud-Techincal-Document-v6 (1).pdf   766.28KB   245 downloads

[Charles.C]

Hello All,

 

It may help on Food Fraud topics.

 

regards,

redfox

 

MSU-FFIR-GFSI-Food-Fraud-Techincal-Document-v6 .pdf

 

Hi redfox,

 

Thks for the above document which i think is available from MU's website. 

 

It illustrates that  Food Fraud confusion is not expected to disappear anytime soon. Just like HACCP a few decades ago. And still continuing ?

 

Unfortunately the document does not contain any particular way to avoid such confusion.

 

The basic requirement IMO is a methodology involving a limited portfolio of vulnerability assessment questions, answerable via a freely available database.

 

Perhaps a Vulnerability Decision Tree like OPRP ?

[redfox]

Hello Charles,

 

Yes I agree. Confusion is IMO, due to other standard interpretations/scheme, even though same scheme under the umbrella of  GFSI, they may have slight deviation on how to tackle or do the VACCP methodology  201805-food-fraud-technical-document-final.pdf   1.03MB   179 downloads. Plus the FSMA on TACCP, which some food safety officers are confused what their difference. Hoping on this forum we can come up a methodology that we can use on VACCP and VACCP.

 

I forgot to attached one doc from GFSI, though almost the same from my previous post.

 

regards,

redfox

 

 201805-food-fraud-technical-document-final.pdf   1.03MB   179 downloads