Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

SQF 13.6.3.3: Food Packaging Transportation - Sealed Trailers

SQF Code Edition 9 Food Contact Packaging Trans. of Food Packaging

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 khennen

khennen

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 16 March 2021 - 04:25 PM

We are a manufacturer of printed polyethylene bags and films for direct contact food packaging. The SQF Code Edition 9 now has a requirement under 13.6.3.3: Loading, Transport, and Unloading Practices that states: Vehicles (e.g. semi-trucks, trailers, vans, containers) used for transporting food sector packaging from the site shall be secured from tampering using a seal or other acceptable device or system as agreed upon by the carrier and customer. According to the FDA's Final Rule on Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food: The definition of “transportation operations” has been changed to exclude: Transport of food contact substances, which include coatings, plastics, paper, adhesives, as well as colorants, antimicrobials, and antioxidants found in packaging. Virtually all of our shipments are LTL and adding seals is not only impractical but would be very cost prohibitive. I'm interested in the opinions of the group as to the use of "other acceptable device or system". Is there a way to demonstrate compliance by carrier/customer agreements or some other form of internal documentation?


#2 Scampi

Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,487 posts
  • 948 thanks
553
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 16 March 2021 - 04:54 PM

I used to run finished food goods LTL without any other option. I had service/contractual agreements from the trucking company that once loaded, the integrity of my product was their responsibility. That worked for me  Notice the code says "or system"  that allows for situations just like yours.  Basically you cannot ignore transportation risks because of LTL, but you can provide an alternative to seals/locks


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


Thanked by 1 Member:

#3 TimG

TimG

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 398 posts
  • 129 thanks
172
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 16 March 2021 - 05:12 PM

I have quite a few standards, depending on product grade, that I have to meet here. 

 

NSF had a similar requirement for water grade product. After risk analysis, I determined the risk in shipping was if a product was tampered with (opened/resealed) during transit. We put in a system that all NSF grade product must be sealed with tamper evident tape (supersacks, 50lb bags, LTL, full load) and alerted our product managers to pass that info along to the purchasers (customers) of that grade of product, so they are checking for the intact tape on their end of the delivery. That satisfied our auditor in that instance.

Note: Water grade NSF product additives are different than SQF (or GFSI) standards. But it might be worth looking into.



Thanked by 1 Member:

#4 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,653 posts
  • 928 thanks
800
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA
    Never give up, never give in - allways win!
    Melbourne, Florida USA

Posted 16 March 2021 - 08:48 PM

most will concentrate on the seals first - but concentrate in this area -  other acceptable device or system as agreed upon by the carrier and customer.

 

you will need to meet with the carriers and inquire as to how your loads are protected, protection would also include transfer points as well as getting an understanding on how drivers and helpers are training on loads that were there is or can be a food safety impact.

 

i was pleasantly surprized to see a number of carrier reps at a recent state food protectors organization meeting that really were very keen on food safety in handling their clients loads.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC BUSINESS GROUP | SQF System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
 

 

Serving the New Republic of the United States of America, Costa Rica, Panama & Caribbean Islands

 

 


Thanked by 1 Member:

#5 Hoosiersmoker

Hoosiersmoker

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 504 posts
  • 186 thanks
75
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 19 March 2021 - 01:52 PM

Our (SQF Food Packaging Manufacturer - paperboard packaging) system requires seals for incoming raw materials and only full truckloads outbound. Partials are all stated to be the carrier's responsibility from the time they take possession with verification sign off from the driver as to the condition of the product received. In our contracts with carriers safe handling is outlined and required. Trailer inspections incoming and outgoing etc... Our loads are all stretch wrapped so that is a visual gauge to ensure there has been no tampering and condition is verified by the end user / customer / consumer. FDA is only referenced for LOG's to customers and from suppliers.



Thanked by 1 Member:




Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: SQF Code Edition 9, Food Contact Packaging, Trans. of Food Packaging

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users