Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Validating microbiological testing in-house

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

The Food Scientist

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,057 posts
  • 268 thanks
208
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 21 November 2023 - 09:17 PM

Hello everyone, been a while and I know where exactly to go if I have questions, neve disappointed!

 

How does one go about validating their in-house micro testing? 

 

So we pasteurize and bottle fruit juices, and do testing for TPC and Y&M on finished product. And I have some doubts about the way we plate/read/sample or the process as a whole for our micro sampling, we had fermented juice that was detected organoleptically, but on our plates, there was no growth at all shown... weird. We use "peel plates", where just pipette the juice, dispense it on the film, seal the film and incubate it. 

 

What is the best approach to begin and implement a validation study to confirm what we do is correct?

 

I did reach out to a third party lab to coordinate sending them samples and comparing their samples with ours to see if there are any weird results. 

 

Is this a right approach? or does anyone have any other suggestions?

 

Looking forward to hearing everyone's expertise on this.


Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,238 posts
  • 1294 thanks
612
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 22 November 2023 - 03:47 AM

Hi The Food Scientist,

 

Most people would validate and then periodically compare their “peel plates” with results via traditional methods, for example the Conventional Plate Count Method on an ongoing basis.

 

In addition there should be periodic confirmation of accuracy of results via a certified third party laboratory including proficiency testing for the site laboratory/staff/methodology.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony

 



olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,364 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 22 November 2023 - 01:26 PM

We do the same at our ice cream factory: testing every batch of our products for TC/E. Coli using Petrifilms, and sending a set of samples to the external lab once a month, for the same micro.



Bo16

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 76 posts
  • 19 thanks
17
Good

  • United States
    United States

Posted 01 December 2023 - 03:33 PM

You may want to look into the USP for the suitability of testing method for either their dietary supplements or pharmaceuticals.  its a simple, yet requires some work and organisms to verify your method can recover the target organisms.  

Simply add the organisms at low levels (we use organisms with know concentrations that are easily rehydrated and pipetted) and then plate the product as you usually do.  If you recover the correct number of organisms your pass, (they even have a +/- % recovery requirement).  If you don't pass you would need to adjust your method either by dilution, buffer change, chemical additives (there are other ways) and re do the suitability.  

 

Your film manufacturer would also be a good source for a procedure to ensure the method is working for your product.





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users